Lab Goddess Fibre Club December 2015

So this month's inspirational woman scientist was certainly on my short list from the beginning, seeing as I work at her former institution in a building named after her. But I did not plan to have her front and center quite so quickly. A recent trip to the theatre to see Photograph 51 by Anna Ziegler was so moving that I decided that Rosalind Franklin had to be next for the club.

Dark Lady on Bluefaced Leicester

Dark Lady on Bluefaced Leicester

Here's the blurb that went out with the club packages:

Rosalind Franklin and Photograph 51

Rosalind Franklin and Photograph 51

Born into a prominent Jewish family in Notting Hill, London, Rosalind Franklin grew up in a family that valued education and supported her scientific aspirations. She went to St. Paul’s Girls School and from there to Newnham College at Cambridge, where she graduated in 1941 with a degree in chemistry. She then joined the physical chemistry laboratory of the University of Cambridge, working under Ronald Norrish (winner of the 1967 Nobel Prize in Chemistry), but this was not a successful pairing. After resigning from Norrish’s lab, she went on to the British Coal Utilisation Research Association (BCURA), where she remained for several years, studying the porosity of coal. This work formed the basis of her Ph.D. research, which was completed in 1945.

At the end of World War II, Dr. Franklin contacted her friend Adrienne Weill, a former student of Marie Curie, for assistance in finding a position for “a physical chemist who knows very little physical chemistry, but quite a lot about the holes in coal”. She ended up in the lab of Dr. Jacques Mering at the Laboratoire Central des Services Chimiques de l’Etat in Paris. There she learned X-ray crystallography, which would be key to her role in the discovery of the structure of DNA a few years later.  

Rosalind loved Paris, and blossomed in Mering’s lab – she was able to work independently but with a group of enthusiastic and collaborative colleagues. In 1951, however, she left Paris and returned to London, taking up a position as a research associate at King’s College London in the Biophysics Unit headed by John Randall. She was originally slated to work on proteins and lipids in solution, but upon arriving was redirected to work on DNA fibres with Maurice Wilkins and Raymond Gosling, her newly assigned Ph.D. student.

The relationship between Wilkins and Franklin was difficult: conflicting communications styles made their interactions rocky. Perhaps if their roles had been clearly defined and expectations laid out at the very start of Franklin’s time at KCL, their partnership would have been more successful, but miscommunication from Randall and Wilkins being on holiday when Franklin arrived, coupled with her understanding that she would be an independent researcher rather then an underling of Wilkins, made this challenging.

After Franklin and Gosling identified two forms of DNA (A and B), Wilkins continued with the A form while Franklin focused on the B form. Franklin’s X-ray crystallography photographs of DNA were extremely suggestive of a helical structure, but she was very cautious of publishing her data without being absolutely certain of her conclusions. Meanwhile, Francis Crick and James Watson from the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge had begun building a model of the B form of DNA using data that had, in part, been derived from research done by Wilkins and Franklin. The ultimate result was that, although Franklin’s papers were submitted either prior to Watson and Crick finishing their model, or almost immediately after (without any knowledge of the Cambridge model), the critical paper was Crick and Watson’s published in Nature on 25 April 1953. Franklin’s and Wilkins’s papers were published in the same issue of Nature, but were presented as being in support of the Cambridge group’s work, not as parallel and independent findings.

By this time, Rosalind had left KCL, and moved on to BIrkbeck College where she headed her own research group. She left DNA to study RNA and the structure of the tobacco mosaic virus. Her work at Birkbeck was very successful, as she published multiple papers and was awarded a grant from the US National Institutes of Health. Sadly, in mid-1956, while traveling in the States, she began to feel ill. Upon her return to the UK, it was discovered that she had ovarian cancer. She died in September of 1958, four years before Crick, Watson and Wilkins were awarded the Nobel Prize for their body of work on DNA, including the discover of its structure.

Franklin has been portrayed as a prickly and abrasive woman, who held herself apart from the old boys network that was wide spread in British academic circles at the time. She and Wilkins certainly had a fundamental personality clash, with her forthright and impatient communication style running up against his contrasting reticence. However, the real tragedy in this story is not that she didn’t win the Nobel Prize, but that she died too young. As Brenda Maddox writes in her excellent biography[1] “She was cheated of the only thing she really wanted: the chance to complete her work. The lost prize was life”.

[1] “Rosalind Franklin: the Dark Lady of DNA”, Harper Collins, 2002.

The colourway name comes from a (not-very nice) quote from a letter from Maurice Wilkins to Crick and Watson announcing with some relief that Franklin was leaving KCL. For this colourway, I was drawn to colours that might have been associated with post-war Paris, where Rosalind spent such a happy time before going to King’s: greys for the cobbled streets and stone buildings, pinks for springtime flowers, and dark red for (of course!) the wine. I'm very tempted to spin mine up over the holidays as a gradient - darker purpley red to pink to grey to slate blue - and knit a top down hat with a DNA motif. As you do...what would you make with yours?

Spaces are still available in the next round of the Lab Goddess Fibre Club, which will ship out in mid-January; the initial instalment is already in the works, and has a much... earthier inspiration, if that whets your appetites at all. Happy spinning!

Lab Goddess Fibre Club signups now open!

Happy 1st of December! I've opened signups for the first 2016 instalment of the Lab Goddess Fibre Club here, and I hope that lots of you join us! It's been an absolute thrill over the past few months to send off the fibre club, and then see what everyone does with it. I saw one October Fibre Club FO in person yesterday, and I'm still trying to find the perfect project for mine. There are hints of November spinning also popping up here and there.

October Fibre Club, "Alpha, Beta, Gamma" on Finnish, inspired by Dr. Marie Curie

For those of you who aren't familiar with a fibre club, it works like this: every month, I develop a new colourway inspired by a female scientist and her work. As a club member, you receive 4 oz/113 g of fibre each month dyed in this new colourway, along with a brief biography of the scientist and a bit of information about the colours and how I came up with the combinations. Any extras that are leftover after club ships will be available to club members only for six months; after that, they will be available to the general public, although more fibre will not be dyed.

November Fibre Club "Mutable Loci" on Cheviot, inspired by Dr. Barbara McClintock

November Fibre Club "Mutable Loci" on Cheviot, inspired by Dr. Barbara McClintock

It's also been lovely to meet some Fibre Club members in person, and get their feedback. So far, everyone seems to be enjoying themselves, but please do let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I'm looking forward to seeing what the next round of club brings!

 

Lab Goddess Fibre Club November 2015

This month's colourway comes from a suitably seasonal inspiration (at least it's seasonal this week if you celebrate American Thanksgiving). Behold, the lovely colours of maize:

What does this have to do with Lab Goddesses? Well, I'm glad you asked, because this month's highlighted scientist is modern, a woman who, even though she lived a century after Marie Curie, experienced many similar challenges in her scientific life. I remember when she won her Nobel Prize (I was 11), and the fact that my own scientific exploits have led me to use techniques that directly grew out her groundbreaking research makes this month's scientist even more special to me personally. I'm looking forward to spinning up my November fibre for some super sturdy, warm socks to brighten up cold winter days.

Barbara McClintock (1902-1992)

Barbara McClintock (1902-1992)

Mutable Loci on Cheviot

Mutable Loci on Cheviot

From the Fibre Club insert:

Barbara McClintock was the third of four children born to Thomas and Sara McClintock. She was a very independent and solitary child, but knew her own mind – her original first name was Eleanor, which she rejected at an early age as being too feminine and delicate. She grew up in Brooklyn, NY and had a love of science starting in high school.

In 1919, she went to Cornell University’s College of Agriculture over the objections of her mother, who feared that a college education would make her “unmarriageable”*. Her interest in genetics began in 1921, and a year later she was invited to participate in a graduate genetics course at Cornell by C. B. Hutchison, an early plant geneticist. She credits Hutchison as the reason she continued in genetics.

McClintock received an MA and PhD in botany, and her research focused on cytogenetics in maize, the structure and function of corn chromosomes, the coiled structures in the cell nucleus containing DNA. She developed a technique for staining chromosomes that enabled scientists to see chromosome shape for the first time. By studying chromosome shape, Dr. McClintock was able to link inherited traits to specific chromosomes. In 1930, McClintock was the first person to describe a specific chromosomal shape seen during meiosis, the process that generates reproductive cells like sperm and eggs. Together with Dr. Harriet Creighton, she found that recombination of chromosomes, the swapping of DNA between two chromosomes, was correlated with the appearance of new traits in the resultant offspring plant.

In 1941, after five years at the University of Missouri, Dr, McClintock went to Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, where she remained for the rest of her career. There she began to analyse the mechanism of mosaic colour patterns of maize seed, and their unstable inheritance. This led to the discovery in 1948 of transposons, mobile genetic elements that are regulated by a mechanism that allows for cells with identical genomes to have different functions. This research was initially met with puzzlement and hostility, and unfortunately, she stopped publishing her research on transposons in 1953 due to fears of alienating the scientific mainstream.

Although she officially retired in 1967, Dr. McClintock continued to pursue research at Cold Spring Harbor. Although a French group discovered similar genetic controlling elements in the early 1960s, Dr. McClintock’s pioneering work was not acknowledged until the early 1970s, when she was widely credited with discovering transposition, and ultimately the discovery of genetic regulation.

Jumping genes in a nutshell

Jumping genes in a nutshell

Barbara McClintock was the third woman ever elected to the National Academy of Science, and was the first female president of the Genetics Society of America, both in 1944. In 1981, she was the first recipient of a MacArthur Foundation Grant, also known as the MacArthur Genius grant. She was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1983, and was the first woman to win the prize unshared. Her work on “jumping genes” and genetic regulation paved the way for the incredible explosion of molecular biology and genetics in the 80s and 90s. She continued to work at Cold Spring Harbor after winning the Nobel Prize, and died of natural causes in 1992 at the age of 90. True to her mother’s fear, she never married.​


* I'm realising as I continue to research future women scientists for these colourways that I am running into a number of similar issues regarding how to convey their work and why I've chosen them without descending into strident feminist outrage, and telling the same story ad nauseum. I hope you'll find these overview interesting and not off putting. Please let me know your thoughts.

Festiwool recap

Well, it's been a bit of a crazy weekend around here, what with Nordládda going live and heading up to Festiwool on Saturday! Allison and I were on the road before 7:00 am on our way to Hitchin, and we made it there in good time.

Stall is ready to go!

Stall is ready to go!

After a somewhat hectic set-up (poor Alli didn't get her breakfast until after the show opened!), we were ready to go! I hadn't been to Festiwool before, and was really happy with the space: it was bright, airy and well lit, even though the day was grey and overcast. We were right next to Third Vault Yarns, and I was very entertained to find that, just like designers, two dyers can come up with the same idea independently.

On the left, Porpoise Fur Holly Walk on Romney; on the right, Third Vault Yarns The Magpie on superwash Merino Aran weight squooshtastic yarn.

On the left, Porpoise Fur Holly Walk on Romney; on the right, Third Vault Yarns The Magpie on superwash Merino Aran weight squooshtastic yarn.

It was really lovely to see some familiar faces from Fibre-East, and to meet some Fibre Club members who are having fun with their club parcels! Thank you all for stopping by, and well done to those of you who were insistent that you really didn't need another hobby (but you do, come on, you know you do!)

There will be a big update on Saturday, 21 November at 10:00 am London time with lots of woolly goodness, including last month and this month's Phat Fiber colourways, and some new holiday-themed colours just in time for December. Happy spinning!

Lab Goddess Fibre Club October 2015

The first installment of the Lab Goddess Fibre club went out last week, and I've been eager to share it with everyone.

As part of the fibre club membership, in addition to getting an exclusive colourway inspired by a female scientist, you also get included with your package a mini-biography of the person, a walk through the development of the colourway and why I chose the colours I did. This very special first fibre club was inspired by Dr. Marie Curie. Really, could it have been anyone else?

Alpha, Beta, Gamma on Finnish

Alpha, Beta, Gamma on Finnish

Marie (Maria) Sklodowska Curie

Born: 7 November 1867

Died: 4 July 1934

Maria Sklodowska was the youngest of five children born to two teachers – her mother ran a boarding school and her father taught mathematics and physics. When the Russians eliminated laboratory science from the curriculum, her father brought the equipment home for his children.

As she was unable to go to university in Russian-controlled Poland, Maria enrolled at the University of Paris, where she studied physics, chemistry and mathematics from 1891-1894. When she finished her studies in 1894, she planned to return to Poland, but she discovered upon a return visit that she would not be able to pursue her career there, again because she was a woman. She instead returned to Paris to pursue her PhD, and married Pierre Curie.

 Madame Curie’s dissertation work grew out of the 1895 discovery of X-rays. Her research investigated these rays emitted by the element uranium. She found that uranium rays (radioactivity) enabled the surrounding air to conduct electricity, and could easily be detected with an electrometer. Her further work identified two uranium-containing minerals that were more active then uranium in terms of their radiation; her hypothesis that these minerals contained other radiating elements led to the identification of polonium and radium in 1898.

In 1903, Marie and Pierre Curie shared the Nobel Prize in Physics with Henri Becquerel, the first time the prize had been awarded to a woman. Three years later, Pierre was killed in an accident, and Madame Curie was offered his chair of the physics department at the University of Paris; she became the first female professor at the University.

In 1910, Marie isolated radium, and in 1911, she was the first person (and still the only woman) to be awarded a second Nobel Prize, this time in Chemistry for the discovery and isolation of radium and polonium. She remains the only person to have won Nobel Prizes in multiple sciences.

The practical importance of Marie Curie’s discoveries is hard to describe completely. The discovery of radioactive decay threw a monkey wrench into the understanding of physics and chemistry at the beginning of the twentieth century. The discovery of radioactivity has contributed to advances in physics, medicine, anthropology and geology, to name a few fields. In my own experience, radioactive isotopes are used extensively in the lab on a daily basis for cellular and molecular biomedical research, enabling scientists to answer critical questions about health and disease.

Sadly, our current understanding of the dangers of radioactivity were not known in Madame Curie’s time, and she died in 1934 from aplastic anemia, a blood disorder that was a direct result of her early, unprotected work with radioactive compounds    

The colourway:

Madame Curie is the first woman scientist I remember reading about as a child, and I was fascinated by this woman who refused to let being a girl stop her from doing incredible things. In developing this colourway, I wanted to recognise the life-saving consequences of Madame Curie’s work, but also the dangers inherent in radiation.

I chose a bright, leafy green combined with murky chartreuse, separated by darker obscuring shades, all of which is meant to signify the light and dark sides of radioactivity.

The name comes from the three particles that are emitted during radioactive decay